Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. v. Unicor Medical, Inc., No. 6:06-cv-00020 (E.D. Tex. July 21, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00020, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
July 21, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION interpreting disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,483,443, as well as terms the parties agreed to construe. Claims are in Appendix A, the Court's interpretations in Appendix B
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PROMPT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, L.P., Plaintiff, vs. McKESSON CORP., Defendant. § § § § CASE NO. 6:05-CV-485-LED § PATENT CASE § § § § PROMPT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, L.P., Plaintiff, vs. 3M HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS, A Division of 3M Company, Defendant. § § § § CASE NO. 6:05-CV-487-LED § PATENT CASE § § § § § PROMPT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, L.P., Plaintiff, vs. UNICOR MEDICAL, INC., Defendant. § § § § CASE NO.