E.D. Tex.

Medical Research Institute v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc et al, No. 6:05-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2007)

Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.: No. 6:05-cv-00417, Dkt. No. 131
Decided: January 12, 2007
Judge: Leonard Davis, J.
Document: Order
Docket Entry: MEMORANDUM OPINION/CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION construing terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,905,707 B2. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in Appendix B; the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A
Length: 18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, vs. BIO-ENGINEERED SUPPLEMENTS & NUTRITION, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § CASE NO. 605 CV 417 § PATENT CASE § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Claim Construction Opinion construes terms in U.S. P atent No. 6,905,707 B2 (filed Aug. 23, 2002)(“the ‘707 patent”). BACKGROUND Medical Research Institute (“MRI”) alleges that Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc. (“BSN”) infringes the ‘707 patent.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error