Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rice v. Honeywell International Inc et al, No. 6:05-cv-00330 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00330, Dkt. No. 239
Decided
June 28, 2007
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 229 Report and Recommendations, overruling Rice's objections to the R&R and granting Rolls-Royce's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. B1 4,896,499
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The a bove entitled and numbered c ivil action was re ferred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. L ove pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . § 636. The Repor t of the Magistrate Judge ( Docket No. 229) c ontaining his re commendation conc erning the disposition of De fendant Roll s Roy ce’s Motion for S ummary J udgment of Non- Infringement of U .S. Patent No. B1 4,896,499 (“ the ‘499 pa tent”) ( Docket No. 137). Plaintiff Ivan G.