Mediatek, Inc v. Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd., et al, No. 6:05-cv-00323 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MEDIATEK, INC., Plaintiff, vs. SANYO ELECTRIC CO LTD.; SANYO NORTH AMERICA, INC.; AND SANYO NORTH AMERICAN CORPORATION, Defendants. § § § § § CASE NO. 605 CV 323 § PATENT CASE § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,751,356 (“the ‘356 patent”); 5,867,819 (“the ‘819 patent”); and 6,118,486 (“the ‘486 patent”). BACKGROUND MediaTek alleges that Sanyo infringes three of its patents.