Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orion IP LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al, No. 6:05-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 2, 2007)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 528
Decided
May 2, 2007
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: the correct filing date of the '627 patents' parent. The jury will be instructed that the critical date is 11/10/1988, so the Court does not need to determine whether the corrected filing date of the parent …
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

At the pretrial hearing, the Court denied Hyundai’s motion in limine no. 2 to preclude Orion from mentioning or introducing evidence concerning the PTO’s decision to change the ‘627 patents’ parent’s filing date. The issue of the correct filing date was also raised in Hyundai’s motion for summary judgment, which the Court denied without an opinion. Hyundai contends tha t the ‘627 pate nt’s commerc ial embodiment, CASS Parts, was publically used and on sale on November 10, 1988 at a Parts Fair in New Orleans, Louisiana. Under 35 U.S.C.