Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc v. D-Link Corporation et al, No. 6:05-cv-00291 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00291, Dkt. No. 137
Decided
November 20, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 118 MOTION to Strike the Declaration of Rich Seifert filed by Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc, and construing terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in Appe…
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in U.S . Patent No. 6,218,930 (“the ‘930 patent”). Claims 1, 2, 6, and 9 contain disputed terms. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Network- 1's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Rich Seifert (Docket No. 118-1), which the Court DENIES. BACKGROUND The ‘930 patent issued April 17, 2001, to Boris Katzenberg. The ‘930 patent discloses a set of circuits that enable the delivery of operating power over Ethernet (commonly referred to as “PoE”) only to those access devices that are designed to accept such power.