E.D. Tex.

Nutrition21, LLC v. GNC Corporation et al, No. 6:05-cv-00228 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2006)

Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.: No. 6:05-cv-00228, Dkt. No. 105
Decided: August 17, 2006
Judge: Leonard Davis, J.
Document: Order
Docket Entry: MEMORANDUM OPINION interpreting disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,087,623; 5,087,624; and 5,175,156. Appendix A sets out the claims with the terms at issue in bold; Appendix B sets out the Court's claim constructions in table form
Length: 35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Append ix A to this Memorandum Opinion co ntains the rel evant claims of the p atents-in-suit, with the1 cons trued t erms i ndi cat ed i n bol dface type. Ap pendi x B cont ains the Cour t’s Claim C ons truction Char t, wh ich construes the re levant term s. The par ties agree that for pu rpos es of construction bot h chromi c picol inate and c hromi c tripicol inate may be2 abbreviated as “C P.” 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NUTRITION 21, LLC, Plaintiff, vs.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error