Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Halliburton Energy Services Inc v. M-I LLC, No. 6:05-cv-00155 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2006)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00155, Dkt. No. 201
Decided
October 18, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 50 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity based on indefiniteness filed by M-I LLC. Because the Court has found that the asserted claims of the '832 Patent are indefinite, it is unnecessary to…
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

United St ates Pa tent N o. 6, 887,832 ( the “ ‘832 Pa tent”) i s b efore the Cou rt for c laim construction. Also bef ore the Court is Defenda nt M-I , L LC’s (“M-I”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Docket No. 50). Having considered the parties’ written and oral arguments, the Court is unable to construe the claims and theref ore GRANTS M-I’s motion for summary judgment.