Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lantronix,Inc, et al v. Digi International, Inc, No. 6:05-cv-00035 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00035, Dkt. No. 83
Decided
March 6, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION construes the terms in US Patent No. 4,972,470. Only independent claim 1 and dependent claim 8 contain disputed terms
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION LANTRONIX, INC. and ACTICON § TECHNOLOGIES LLC § § Plaintiffs § § vs. § § DIGI INTERNATIONAL, INC. § § Defendant § CASE NO. 6:05CV35 PATENT CASE MEMORANDUM OPINION This M emorandum Opinion construes th e te rms in U. S. Pa tent N o. 4, 972,470. On ly independent claim 1 and dependent claim 8 contain disputed terms. BACKGROUND The ‘470 patent issued November 20, 1990 to Steven Farago.