Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

American Video Graphics, L.P. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:05-cv-00006 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00006, Dkt. No. 103
Decided
September 1, 2005
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 89 Motion to Expedite, granting in part and denying in part 90 Sealed Motion and ORDERS AVG to supplement its infringement contentions as soon as it can but no later than September 30, 2005. All other relief is DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court a re Microsoft’s Expedited Motion to Compel A VG to S upplement Infringement Cont entions Pursuant to P.R . 3-1 (Doc ket No. 90) a nd Microsoft’s Motion for Expedited Ruling on Its Motion to Compel (Docket No. 89). Given that AVG voluntarily responded to Microsoft’s motion to compel under an abbreviated response time and that the Court is now ruling on Microsoft’s motion to c ompel, the Court DENIES as moot Microso ft’s motion to ex pedite.