Maxell, Ltd. v. TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., (F/K/A TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd..., No. 5:23-cv-00108 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections (Docket No. 139) and Defendants’ Objections (Docket No. 140) to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R ”) of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 135). Both sides have filed responses. Docket Nos. 144, 145. For the reasons set forth below, the objections (Docket Nos. 139, 140) are OVERRULED, and the R&R (Docket No. 135) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Maxell asserts Defendants directly and indirectly infringe U.S. Patent Nos.