Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pantech Corporation et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al, No. 5:22-cv-00113 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
§ 101 Eligibility Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:22-cv-00113, Dkt. No. 211
Decided
September 26, 2023
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER Before the Court are the Pantech Plaintiffs' Objections (Docket No. 164) and the LGE Defendants' Objections (Docket. No. 172) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 153) recommending that LGE's Partial Motion …
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Pantech Plaintiffs’ Objections (Docket No. 164) and the LGE Defendants’ Objections (Docket. No. 172) to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 153) recommending that LGE’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 18) be denied. Both sets of objections have been fully briefed. Docket Nos. 202, 206. BACKGROUND Pantech filed this patent infringement action against LGE, asserting seven patents related to smartphones and cellular communications. Docket No. 1.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error