Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

National Oilwell Varco, L.P. v Auto-Dril, Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00085 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:09-cv-00085, Dkt. No. 152
Decided
August 16, 2011
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER regarding claim construction briefs and chart
Length
53 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief (Docket Entry No. 97), Defendant’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Docket Entry No. 114), and Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Reply Brief (Docket Entry No. 135). Also before the Court are the parties’ Claim Construction Prehearing Statements (Docket Entry Nos. 141, 142) and the First Amended Claim Construction Chart (Docket Entry No. 149). A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments, 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d, 517 U.S.