Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ichl LLC v. BFG Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 5:08-cv-00175 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:08-cv-00175, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
April 20, 2010
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re claim construction briefs
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief (Docket Entry Nos. 87, 67, and 92), Defendants’ Re sponsive Claim Cons truction Br ief (D ocket Entry Nos. 90, 69, and 94), a nd Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Reply Brief (Docket Entry Nos. 96, 73, and 99). A lso before the Court are the Local Patent Rule (LPR) 4-3 Joint Claim Construction Statement (Docket Entry Nos. 86,66, and 91) and the LPR 4-5 Joint Claim Construction Chart (Docket Entry Nos. 100, 76, and 2 102). A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v.