Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motorola Inc v. Vtech Communications, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:07-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 179
Decided
July 6, 2009
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER; court construes claim terms consistent
Length
99 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING U.S. PATENT NOS. 5,157,391; 5,394,140; 5,848,356; 4,866,766; 7,070,349; and U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. D559,842 This Opinion construes terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,157,391 (“the ‘391 patent”), 5,394,140 (“the ‘140 patent”), 5,848,356 (“the ‘356 patent”), 4,866,766 (“the ‘766 patent”)(collectively the “user-interface patents”) as well as terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,070,349 (“the ‘349 patent”) and U.S. Design Patent No. D559,842 (“ the ‘842 pa tent”)(collectively “the ke ypad pate nts”). Plaintiff Motorola, I nc.