Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. Franklin Covey Co. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2008)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:07-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 636
Decided
November 17, 2008
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
8. (mrm, )ORDER adopting 563 Report and Recommendations,, granting 437 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Brief in Support Thereof filed by Herbalife International of America, Inc.,
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In her Report and Recommendation dated July 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Herbalife’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement be granted. Dkt. No. 563. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found no genuine issues of material fact regarding whether Herbalife was a “user” under the Federal Circuit’s opinion in NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd., 418 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2005), or this Court’s opinion in epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc., et al., 492 F. Supp. 2d 608 (E.D. Tex. 2007). Id. at 18-23.