Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Level 3 Communications Inc et al, No. 5:06-cv-00101 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:06-cv-00101, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
July 24, 2013
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Constr uction Brief (Dkt. No. 128), Defendants’ Response (Dkt. No. 130), Plaintiff’s Reply ( Dkt. No. 133 ), and Defendants’ Sur -Reply (Dkt. No. 134) . Also before the Court are the Local Patent Rule (“P.R.”) 4 -3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No. 127) and the P.R. 4-5(d) Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. No. 132) (“JCCC”). A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments , 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d, 517 U.S.