Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netac Technology Company Ltd v. PNY Technologies Inc, No. 5:06-cv-00029 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2007)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:06-cv-00029, Dkt. No. 92
Decided
December 13, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Adopting constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the '672 patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the p…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the c ourt issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction. Plaintiff Netac Technology, Co., Ltd. (“Netac”) sued defendant PNY Technology Co., Ltd., (“PNY”) for infringing United States Patent No. 6,829,672 (the “‘672 patent”) on February 10, 2006. Netac is a Chinese entity. The two inventors of the ‘672 patent, Guoshun Deng and Xiaohua Cheng reside in Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China. II.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error