Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EchoStar Technologies Corporation v. TiVo Inc. et al, No. 5:05-cv-00081 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2006)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:05-cv-00081, Dkt. No. 126
Decided
July 14, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
on July 14, 2006. (rml, )ORDER denying 55 Motion to Compel, denying 57 Motion to Compel, denying 82 Sealed Motion, denying 94 Motion for Extension of Time to File, denying 100 Motion for Leave to File, granting 120 Motion to Stay
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges, Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Docket Entry # 120) w as referred to the Honorable Car oline M. Craven for the purposes of hearing and determining sa id motion. The Court, having considered the m otion, response, and all relevant pleadings, is of the opinion the motion should be GRANTED. I.