Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Datatreasury Corp v. Ingenico S.A., et al, No. 5:02-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2005)

Denied
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:02-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 191
Decided
June 1, 2005
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER; adopting 189 Report and Recommendations, Motions terminated: denied without prejudice to refiling 171 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Ingenico Inc,
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The a bove-entitled and n umbered civil action was he retofore re ferred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court is of the opinion that the f indings and conclusions of the Ma gistrate Judge are correct.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error