Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd. v. Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC, No. 4:24-cv-00847 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 10, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Panasonic Entertainment & Communication Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Dkt. #53). Having considered the Motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. BACKGROUND This case arises from an alleged patent infringement of four of Defendant’s patents (Dkt. #1 at pp. 22, 31, 41, 49 ) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). Plaintiff alleges in its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment that Defendant infringed on the Asserted Patents when it “import[ed] .