Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Ericsson, Inc., No. 4:24-cv-00796 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2025)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:24-cv-00796, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
October 20, 2025
Judge
See opinion
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each ot…
Length
60 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaint iff Mobility Workx, LLC’s (“ Plaintiff’s” or “Mobility’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #26). 1 Also before the Court is the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #27) filed by De fendants Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”), Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia of America Corporation (collectively, “Nokia”) (all, collectively, “Defendants”)2 as well as Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. #29). 3 Further before the Court are the parties’ July 25, 2025 P.R.