Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

R2 Solutions LLC v. Databricks, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-01147 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:23-cv-01147, Dkt. No. 70
Decided
December 2, 2024
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Databricks, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. 20) is hereby DENIED
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before this Court is Defendant Databricks Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. #20). Having considered the Motion and relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND On December 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that Defendant infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,190,610 (“the ’ 610 Patent”) (Dkt. #1 at p. 12 ). The ’610 Patent, entitled “MapReduce for Distributed Database Processing,” issued to Plaintiff on May 29, 2012 (Dkt. #1 ¶ 13).