Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wapp Tech Limited Partnership, ET AL. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 4:23-cv-01137 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 19, 2024)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:23-cv-01137, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
November 19, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each ot…
Length
37 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs WAPP Tech Limited Partnership and WAPP Tech Corporation’s (“Plaintiff’s” or “WAPP’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #64). Also before the Court is the Responsive Claim Cons truction Brief (Dkt. #66) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or “JPMC” or “Chase”), as well as Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. #71). Further before th e Court are the parties’ Augus t 9, 2024 P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction Statement (Dkt. #45), the partie s’ October 29, 2024 P.R. 4-5(d) Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt.