Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC v. Nikon Corporation, No. 4:23-cv-00923 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:23-cv-00923, Dkt. No. 72
Decided
March 25, 2025
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant Nikon Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) (Dkt. #23) is hereby DENIED
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Nikon Corporation’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) (Dkt. # 23). Having considered the Motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND On October 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in six patent infringement cases 1 alleging that Defendant infringed U.S. Patent No s. 7,612,805 (“the ’805 Patent”); 8,451,339 (“the ’339 Patent”); and 10,873,685 (“the ’685 Patent”); and 10,877,266 (“the ’266 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) (Dkt.