Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Scale Video Coding LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-00803 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2025)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:23-cv-00803, Dkt. No. 86
Decided
April 7, 2025
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The parties are ORDERED to not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other's claim-construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ORDERED to refrain from mentioning any part of t…
Length
37 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court held a Markman hearing to determine the proper construction of several disputed claim terms in Un ited States Patent No. 11,019,372 (“the ’372 Patent”). (Dkt. #64). Having considered the parties’ filings, (Dkt. #22, #24, #28), the parties’ arguments at the hearing, the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, and the relevant law, the Court issues this Claim Construction Order. See Teva Pharms. USA v. Sandoz, Inc., 574 U.S. 318, 331–32, 135 S.Ct. 831, 190 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015); Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc). I.