Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sqwin S.A. v. Walmart Inc., No. 4:22-cv-01040 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:22-cv-01040, Dkt. No. 24
Decided
June 28, 2023
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) [CORRECTED] filed by Walmart Inc. Accordingly, SQWIN's indirect infringement and willful infringement claims are DISMISSED …
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. #11). The Court held a hearing on the motion. (Dkt. #21, #23 ). Having considered the motion, applicable law, briefing by the parties, and argument presented at the hearing, the Court concludes that the motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND In this patent infringement case, SQWIN SA (“SQWIN”) has filed suit against Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”) alleging direct, indirect, and willful infringement of three of its patents —Patent Nos.