Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

AML IP, LLC v. Bath & Body Works, LLC, No. 4:22-cv-00216 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2024)

Granted
Motion to Dismiss § 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:22-cv-00216, Dkt. No. 47
Decided
August 13, 2024
Judge
Sean D. Jordan, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkt. #25, #28, #31), are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are three motions to dismiss, filed by Defendants The Buckle, Inc., Bath & Body Works Direct, Inc., and Big Lots Stores, LLC, respectively. (Dkt. #25, #28, #31). Plaintiff AML IP, LLC (“AML”) filed response s in opposition, (Dkt. #26, #29, #32), and Defendants filed replies , (Dkt. #27, #30, #33). The Court held a hearing on the motions , (Dkt. # 44), after which AML filed a supplemental response, (Dkt. #45), and Defendants responded, (Dkt. #46).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error