Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Xerox Corporation v. Monument Peak Ventures, LLC, No. 4:21-cv-00683 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:21-cv-00683, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
August 18, 2020
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
DECISION AND ORDER: The applications of Mr. Krishnapriyan and Ms. Kim to be admitted pro hac vice to this Court (ECF Nos. 25, 26) are GRANTED for the purpose of representing Xerox in this action. Defendant's motion to dismiss 13 is DENIED W…
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

MONUMENT PEAK VENTURES, LLC, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) brings this declaratory judgment action, alleging that it has not infringed upon certain patents held by Defendant Monument Peak Ventures, LLC (“MPV”). ECF No. 1. Presently before the Court are two matters. First, MPV moves to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). ECF No. 13. Xerox opposes the motion and requests jurisdictional discovery. ECF No. X.