Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Gravel Rating Systems LLC v. McAfee, LLC, No. 4:21-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:21-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 36
Decided
November 29, 2021
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 23 Opposed MOTION to Strike the Expert Declaration of Hernandez as Extraneous Material Outside the Proper Scope of a Rule 12(B)(6) Motion filed by McAfee, LLC
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant McAfee, LLC’s Motion to Strike the Expert Declaration of Hernandez as Extraneous Material Outside the Proper Scope of a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion (Dkt. #23). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court finds Defendant’s motion should be DENIED as moot. Plaintiff Gravel Rating Systems LLC (“Gravel”) asserts infringement of claims 4-5 and 8-9 of its U.S. Patent No. 7,590,636 (the “’636 patent”) against Defendant McAfee, LLC (“McAfee”).