Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Enserion, LLC v. Orthofix, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-00108 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:20-cv-00108, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
September 16, 2020
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant Orthofix's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #11) is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Orthofix’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #11). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that it should be DENIED. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2020, Plaintiff Enserion sued Defendant Orthofix for patent infringement (Dkt. #1). On June 22, 2020, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #11). On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff responded (Dkt. #20). On July 27, 2020, Defendant replied (Dkt. #23). On August 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed its Sur-Reply (Dkt. #24).