American Patents LLC v. Coolpad Group Limited et al, No. 4:19-cv-00877 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 15, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s letter brief moving to exclude Defendants’ expert testimony on indefiniteness. In response, Defendants submitted an opposing letter brief and moved to prohibit Plaintiff from offering rebuttal expert testimony. Hav ing considered the letter briefs and oral arguments, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be DENIED and Defendants’ motion should be DENIED.