Bayco Products, Inc. v. ProTorch Company, Inc. et al, No. 4:19-cv-00648 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants ProTorch Company, Inc. (“ProTorch U.S.”), Suzhou ProTorch Co., Ltd. (“ProTorch China”), Tim Goetz & Associates LLC (“Goetz & Associates”), and Hong Huang also known as Henry Huang’s (“Huang”) (collectively, “Defendants”) First Amended Motion to Dismiss the Case and Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #37). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background As early as 2003, Plaintiff Bayco Products, Inc.