Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC v. Superior Turnkey Solutions Group, Inc., No. 4:19-cv-00516 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:19-cv-00516, Dkt. No. 36
Decided
May 1, 2020
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay (Dkt. 17) is DENIED
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Stay (Dkt. #17). After consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND I. Factual Summary This is a patent infringement case. Plaintiff Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC (“Parallel Networks”) alleges Defendant Superior Turnkey Solutions Group, Inc. (“Superior Turnkey”) directly infringed United States Patent Nos. 5,894,554 and 6,415,335 (collectively, the “patents- in-suit”) (Dkt. #1).