Richell USA, Inc. v. Cinmar, LLC et al, No. 4:18-cv-00847 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay (Dkt. #37). The parties explain, “Although no settlement was reached at the mediation, during the mediation the parties agreed to explore a business resolution for the parties’ current dispute. ” (Dkt. #37 at p. 1). Accordingly, the parties request the C ourt stay all deadlines for ninety day “[i]n order to allow business representatives to continue to explore a business resolution . . . .” (Dkt. #37 at p. 1).