Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wapp Tech Limited Partnership et al v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 4:18-cv-00501 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00501, Dkt. No. 15
Decided
August 19, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay (Dkt. #11) is hereby DENIED as premature
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo & Co. ’s Motion to Stay (Dkt. #11). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied as premature. BACKGROUND Between July 2, 2018, and July 20, 2 018, Plaintiffs Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp. filed this case and three other related cases in this Court. See Wapp Tech Ltd. P’ship v. Hewlett-Packard Enter. Co., 4:18-CV-00468-ALM; Wapp Tech Ltd. P’ship v. Micro Focus Int’l PLC, 4:18-CV-469-ALM; Wapp Tech Ltd. P’ship v. Bank of Am.