Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Gestion Proche, Inc. v. Dialight Corporation, No. 4:16-cv-00407 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:16-cv-00407, Dkt. No. 32
Decided
May 1, 2017
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and to Dismiss the Complaint with Prejudice filed by Dialight Corporation
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Dialight Cor poration’s (“Dialight”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and to Dismiss the Complaint wi th Prejudice (Dkt. #10). After considering the relevant motion and responses, the Court denies Defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND On June 16, 2016, Gestion Proche, Inc. (“Ges tion”) filed its complaint against Dialight, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,557,524 (the “’524 Patent”). On October 10, 2016, Dialight filed the present motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. #10).