Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cooktek Induction Systems, LLC v. I/O Controls Corporation, No. 4:15-cv-00548 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00548, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
August 2, 2016
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Transfer to the Central District of California (Dkt. 48) is hereby DENIED
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants I/O Controls Corporation, Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., and Panda Express, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Transfer to the Central D istrict of California (Dkt. #48). After reviewing the relevant briefing and materials, the Court finds that the motion is denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed suit against Defendants, asserting patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,066,374 entitled “Induction-Based Food Holding/Warming System and Method” on August 13, 2015 (Dkt. #1). Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company (Dkt.