Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oasis Research, LLC v. PRO Softnet Corp., No. 4:12-cv-00531 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:12-cv-00531, Dkt. No. 4
Decided
August 21, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
zzant on 8/21/2012. (baf, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 106 Motion to Sever and Transfer Claims Against Pro Softnet to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, or in the Alternative, To Dismiss
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Pro Softnet Corporation’s Motion to Sever and Transfer Claims Against Pro Softnet to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, or In the Altern ative, To Dismiss (Dkt. #106). 1 Having considered the relevant pleadings, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s motion should be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Oasis Research, LLC (“Plaintiff”) is a Delaware limited liability company with its previous principal place of business in Marshall, Texas (Dkt. #253 at 2).