Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

HowLink Global LLC v. Centris Information Systems, LLC et al, No. 4:11-cv-00071 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2015)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00071, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
January 8, 2015
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 189 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 183 Motion for Attorney Fees,, filed by Network Communications International Corp, DENYING 178 Motion for Bill o…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Network Communications International Corp.’s Motion for Costs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 68 of Plaintiff Howlink Global LLC (Dkt.