Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

International Development Corporation v. Richmond et al, No. 4:08-cv-00111 (E.D. Tex. May 16, 2008)

Granted
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:08-cv-00111, Dkt. No. 15
Decided
May 16, 2008
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The Defendants shall file their responses by 5/28/2008. Defendant Advantive Ideas is ORDERED to refrain from filing any further pleadings unless signed by a licensed at…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Before the court is Defend ants Adventive Ideas, LLC and Simon N. Richmond’s pro se Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. No. 13), filed April 28, 2008, in which Defendants request a 30-day extension of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Because this request is for only a 30 day extension, the court will not expend the considerable time it would take to resolve the issue of whether Richmond was evading service of pr ocess.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case