Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:25-cv-01219 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Phenix Longhorn LLC’s Motion for Sanctions Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and 16. Dkt. No. 225. The Motion is fully briefed, see Dkt. Nos. 238, 263, 286, and the Court held a hearing on November 24, 2025, see Dkt. No. 288. In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks to strike, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 16, AUO’s Eighth Supplemental Ini tial Disclosures, as well as AUO’s Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Counterclaims because they did not disclose these coun tercla…