Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LED Wafer Solutions, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-00948 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2026)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00948, Dkt. No. 65
Decided
June 29, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 30 MOTION to Dismiss BASED ON CLAIM SPLITTING AND IMPROPER VENUE filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC. (Motion(s)30 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Claim Splitting and Improper Venue ( the “Motion”) filed by filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together, “Samsung Electronics”), and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (“SAS”) (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 30.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I.