Kiwi Intellectual Assets Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-00811 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) a certain subset of Plaintiff’s patent claims . (Dkt. No. 24.) Samsung contends that KIWI’s pre-suit indirect and willful infringement claims should be dismissed , while KIWI represents that “it is not currently maintaining” these claims. (Dkt. No. 26 at 1.) Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and the positions of the parties, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED.