Acer, Incorporated v. Paccar, Inc.,, No. 2:25-cv-00740 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is PACCAR Inc’s Opposed Motion to Seal Limited Portions of Acer, Inc.’s Complaint (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 21.) Having considered the Motion, all associated briefing, and the documents submitted in support thereof, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. Defendant PACCAR Inc contends that paragraphs 18–22 of the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) should be sealed. (Dkt. No. 21 at 1.) Those paragraphs discuss failed licensing efforts between Plaintiff Acer, Inc.’s licensing agent Avanci, LLC and Defendant. (Dkt. No.