Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:25-cv-00667 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00667, Dkt. No. 63
Decided
April 23, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 48 Motion to Focus Asserted Patent Claims
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion to Focus Asserted Patent Claims (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Defendants,” or “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 48.) Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff,” or “Network- 1”) filed its Complaint against Samsung on June 27, 2025. (Dkt. No.