Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

AR Design Innovations LLC v. Lowes Companies, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00529 (E.D. Tex. June 2, 2026)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00529, Dkt. No. 56
Decided
June 2, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 31 Motion to Dismiss
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Lowe’s Companies, Inc.’s (“Defendant,” or “Lowe’s”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 31.) Having considered the Motion and all related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED AS MODIFIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff AR Design Innovations LLC (“Plaintiff,” or “AR Design”) filed the above - captioned case against Lowe’s on May 15, 2025, asserting infringement of at least claim 1 of U.S. Patent No.