Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Malikie Innovations Ltd. et al v. Core Scientific, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00519 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00519, Dkt. No. 87
Decided
March 24, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 23 Motion to Transfer Venue
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Core Scientific’s Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Dkt. No. 23. The motion is fully briefed, Dkt. Nos. 45, 47, 48, and the Parties submitted a notice of additional facts and a response, Dkt. Nos. 59, 60. In the Motion, Core seeks transfer to Western District of Texas (“WDTX”) because “no party has relevant ties to this District an d [WDTX] is clearly more convenient.” Dkt. No. 23 at 1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. I.