Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Knossos Global Systems LLC v. Zoho Corporation Private Limited, No. 2:25-cv-00414 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00414, Dkt. No. 39
Decided
March 25, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 13 OPPOSED MOTION to Change Venue Motion to Transfer to Western District of Texas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) filed by Zoho Corporation Private Limited. (Motion(s)13 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Transfer to the Western District of Texas. Dkt. No. 13. In the Motion, Defendant requests transfer, because its U.S. offices are primarily located in Austin, Texas. Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED.1 I. LEGAL STANDARD A. Venue The Judicial Code provides that 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is the “sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions” and is not supplemented by the general venue statutes. TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Grp.