Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Electraled, Inc. v. Lmpg Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00338 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2026)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00338, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
March 31, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 16 MOTION to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) filed by LMPG Inc.. (Motion(s)16 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Transfer to the District of Massachusetts. Dkt. No. 16. In the Motion, Defendant argues that Massachusetts is a more convenient venue for the above-captioned case. Id. at 1. Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned case is TRANSFERRED to the District of Massachusetts. I. LEGAL STANDARD A. Venue The Judicial Code provides that 28 U.S.C.